DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Land Rover Freelander vs 2011 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCaterham
FreelanderModelCSR
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
190 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
420 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4500 mmLength3300 mm
—Width1685 mm
1740 mmHeight1140 mm
1805 KgWeight565 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Land Rover Freelander and 2011 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…