DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Land Rover Freelander vs 2010 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeBMW
FreelanderModelX3
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
190 HPPower177 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank67 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4569 mm
—Width1853 mm
1740 mmHeight1674 mm
1805 KgWeight1740 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Land Rover Freelander and 2010 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…