DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Land Rover Freelander vs 2009 Jaguar X-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
FreelanderModelX-type
2010Model year2009
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
190 HPPower155 HP
420 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4672 mm
—Width1789 mm
1740 mmHeight1430 mm
1805 KgWeight1502 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Land Rover Freelander and 2009 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…