DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Freelander vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
181 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower175 HP
420 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4555 mm
—Width1840 mm
1740 mmHeight1710 mm
1710 KgWeight1530 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Freelander and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…