DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Freelander vs 2001 Chevrolet Prizm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Prizm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChevrolet
FreelanderModelPrizm
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
112 HPPower122 HP
260 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4430 mm
1809 mmWidth1690 mm
1708 mmHeight1360 mm
1565 KgWeight1090 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Freelander and 2001 Chevrolet Prizm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Prizm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…