DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Honda Stepwgn Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Stepwgn

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHonda
FreelanderModelStepwgn
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors4

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
112 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,62 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/80 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4750 mm
1809 mmWidth1790 mm
1708 mmHeight1640 mm
1565 KgWeight1450 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Honda Stepwgn approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Stepwgn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…