DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHonda
FreelanderModelCivic
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
159 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
112 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4425 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1708 mmHeight1410 mm
1565 KgWeight1265 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…