DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Freelander vs 1998 Caterham 21 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCaterham
FreelanderModel21
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
165 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower124 HP
165 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank66 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength3800 mm
1805 mmWidth1580 mm
1760 mmHeight1150 mm
1380 KgWeight650 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Freelander and 1998 Caterham 21 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…