DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Freelander vs 1998 MG MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMG
FreelanderModelMGF
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
165 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
120 HPPower145 HP
165 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength3920 mm
1805 mmWidth1630 mm
1760 mmHeight1260 mm
1380 KgWeight1070 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Freelander and 1998 MG MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…