DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRenault
FreelanderModelLaguna
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4576 mm
1809 mmWidth1772 mm
1708 mmHeight1429 mm
1510 KgWeight1425 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…