DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Fiat Stilo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Stilo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFiat
FreelanderModelStilo
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
160 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
117 HPPower133 HP
160 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4180 mm
1809 mmWidth1785 mm
1708 mmHeight1475 mm
1510 KgWeight1240 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Fiat Stilo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Stilo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…