DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Freelander vs 2004 Lotus Elise Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lotus Elise

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLotus
FreelanderModelElise
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank38 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,15 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size175/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3785 mm
1809 mmWidth1719 mm
1708 mmHeight1143 mm
1510 KgWeight756 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Freelander and 2004 Lotus Elise approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lotus Elise leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…