DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Freelander vs 2004 Honda Edix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Edix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHonda
FreelanderModelEdix
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1668 cc
117 HPPower130 HP
160 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4285 mm
1809 mmWidth1795 mm
1708 mmHeight1610 mm
1510 KgWeight1360 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Freelander and 2004 Honda Edix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Edix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…