DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Toyota Hiace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Hiace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelHiace
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
117 HPPower110 HP
160 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/85 S R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4615 mm
1809 mmWidth1690 mm
1708 mmHeight1935 mm
1510 KgWeight—
2557 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Toyota Hiace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Hiace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…