DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Toyota Caldina Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Caldina

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelCaldina
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4570 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1708 mmHeight1475 mm
1510 KgWeight1200 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Toyota Caldina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Caldina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…