DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSeat
FreelanderModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
160 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
117 HPPower115 HP
160 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4634 mm
1809 mmWidth1810 mm
1708 mmHeight1707 mm
1510 KgWeight1666 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2841 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…