DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Lotus Elise Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lotus Elise

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeLotus
FreelanderModelElise
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
160 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank36 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size185/55 R16; 205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3726 mm
1809 mmWidth1701 mm
1708 mmHeight1202 mm
1510 KgWeight690 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Lotus Elise approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lotus Elise leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…