DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Freelander vs 1998 Eagle Summit Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Eagle Summit

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeEagle
FreelanderModelSummit
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size185/75 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4280 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1708 mmHeight1578 mm
1510 KgWeight1240 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Freelander and 1998 Eagle Summit approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Eagle Summit leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…