DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Discovery vs 1996 Daewoo Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeDaewoo
DiscoveryModelMusso
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
171 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3532 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
155 HPPower220 HP
261 NmTorque307 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank80 lt
19,1 ltUrban consumption16,9 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
14,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size255/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4640 mm
1795 mmWidth1864 mm
1915 mmHeight1735 mm
1925 KgWeight1935 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Discovery and 1996 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…