DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Discovery vs 1996 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChrysler
DiscoveryModelConcorde
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3532 ccEngine displacement3301 cc
155 HPPower163 HP
261 NmTorque245 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank68 lt
19,1 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,9 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength5152 mm
1795 mmWidth1890 mm
1915 mmHeight1429 mm
1925 KgWeight1534 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Discovery and 1996 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…