DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Discovery vs 2006 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
DiscoveryModelXC90
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
190 HPPower210 HP
440 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
255/55 R19Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4800 mm
2009 mmWidth1890 mm
1887 mmHeight1740 mm
2494 KgWeight1985 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Discovery and 2006 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…