DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Discovery vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
DiscoveryModel626
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
148 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
265 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
88 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 88 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4600 mm
1795 mmWidth1690 mm
1960 mmHeight1465 mm
1925 KgWeight1230 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Discovery and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…