DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Discovery vs 2004 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRenault
DiscoveryModelTrafic
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
7Seats9
5Doors4

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
157 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2463 cc
136 HPPower135 HP
300 NmTorque310 Nm
5Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank90 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4782 mm
1860 mmWidth1904 mm
1890 mmHeight1940 mm
2020 KgWeight1935 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Discovery and 2004 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…