DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Land Rover Defender vs 2000 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
DefenderModelCherokee
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

18,1 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
129 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
113 HPPower118 HP
265 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption15,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16 STyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3870 mmLength4255 mm
1790 mmWidth1725 mm
1963 mmHeight1630 mm
1695 KgWeight1515 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Land Rover Defender and 2000 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…