DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Defender vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
DefenderModel626
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,1 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
129 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
265 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R14 88 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4590 mmLength4600 mm
1790 mmWidth1690 mm
2059 mmHeight1465 mm
2055 KgWeight1230 Kg
2794 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Defender and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…