DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Defender vs 2000 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

56.75–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
DefenderModelCherokee
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

18,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
130 km/hTop speed153 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
122 HPPower127 HP
300 NmTorque234 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4599 mmLength4254 mm
1790 mmWidth1763 mm
2059 mmHeight1626 mm
2055 KgWeight1485 Kg
2794 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Defender and 2000 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…