DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A3 Sedan vs 2016 Audi Q2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeAudi
A3 SedanModelQ2
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
202 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement999 cc
110 HPPower116 HP
175 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size—
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4456 mmLength4191 mm
1796 mmWidth1794 mm
1416 mmHeight1508 mm
1265 kgWeight—
425 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A3 Sedan and 2016 Audi Q2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…