DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A3 Sedan vs 2016 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeAudi
A3 SedanModelA3
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
202 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size205/55 R16
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4456 mmLength4237 mm
1796 mmWidth1777 mm
1416 mmHeight1421 mm
1265 kgWeight1150 Kg
425 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A3 Sedan and 2016 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…