1996 • Lancia
Ypsilon
Lancia Ypsilon Y 1.2 (60 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
1996 Lancia Ypsilon vs 2000 Seat Arosa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Seat
Arosa
Seat Arosa 1.2 TDI 3L (61 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Seat Arosa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia YpsilonSpecificationSeat Arosa
LanciaMakeSeat
YpsilonModelArosa
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3Doors3
Performance
Lancia YpsilonSpecificationSeat Arosa
13,3 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
160 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1191 cc
60 HPPower61 HP
102 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia YpsilonSpecificationSeat Arosa
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank34 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption2,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia YpsilonSpecificationSeat Arosa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65R14Tyre size155/65R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia YpsilonSpecificationSeat Arosa
3723 mmLength3529 mm
1690 mmWidth1621 mm
1435 mmHeight1455 mm
935 KgWeight860 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2319 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Lancia Ypsilon and 2000 Seat Arosa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Arosa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…