DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Lancia Phedra vs 2006 Mercury Milan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Milan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeMercury
PhedraModelMilan
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
205 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
204 HPPower212 HP
270 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
215/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4862 mm
1863 mmWidth1834 mm
1760 mmHeight1417 mm
1760 KgWeight1535 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Lancia Phedra and 2006 Mercury Milan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Milan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…