DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Phedra vs 2004 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeHolden
PhedraModelFrontera
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
205 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
204 HPPower205 HP
270 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption17 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4680 mm
1863 mmWidth1785 mm
1760 mmHeight1690 mm
1760 KgWeight1785 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Phedra and 2004 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…