DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Lancia Phedra vs 2008 Suzuki Forenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeSuzuki
PhedraModelForenza
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2000 cc
107 HPPower127 HP
270 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength—
1863 mmWidth—
1760 mmHeight—
1736 KgWeight—
2823 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Lancia Phedra and 2008 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…