DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Phedra vs 2004 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeCitroen
PhedraModelC4
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeCoupe
8Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
174 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
107 HPPower136 HP
270 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4273 mm
1863 mmWidth1769 mm
1760 mmHeight1456 mm
1736 KgWeight1279 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Phedra and 2004 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…