DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Phedra vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia PhedraSpecificationMG ZS
LanciaMakeMG
PhedraModelZS
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Lancia PhedraSpecificationMG ZS
11,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
185 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
136 HPPower117 HP
190 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia PhedraSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia PhedraSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lancia PhedraSpecificationMG ZS
4750 mmLength4520 mm
1863 mmWidth1700 mm
1760 mmHeight1390 mm
1575 KgWeight1125 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Phedra and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…