DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lancia Musa vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
LanciaMakeAudi
MusaModelA3
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
179 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
4035 mmLength4238 mm
1698 mmWidth1765 mm
1660 mmHeight1421 mm
1275 KgWeight1280 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lancia Musa and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…