DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lancia Musa vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
LanciaMakeAudi
MusaModelA3
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
300 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lancia MusaSpecificationAudi A3
4035 mmLength4237 mm
1698 mmWidth1777 mm
1660 mmHeight1421 mm
1275 KgWeight1230 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lancia Musa and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…