DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lancia Musa vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeCitroen
MusaModelC3
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h16,2 s
163 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
77 HPPower68 HP
115 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption3,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption3,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5 EGS
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength3941 mm
1698 mmWidth1728 mm
1660 mmHeight1524 mm
1155 KgWeight1145 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2466 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lancia Musa and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…