DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lancia Musa vs 2012 Mitsubishi Mirage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeMitsubishi
MusaModelMirage
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement999 cc
90 HPPower69 HP
200 NmTorque86 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5GearsCVT
195/60 R15Tyre size165/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength3710 mm
1698 mmWidth1665 mm
1660 mmHeight1490 mm
1200 KgWeight860 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lancia Musa and 2012 Mitsubishi Mirage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…