DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Musa vs 2003 Toyota Vitz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeToyota
MusaModelVitz
2004Model year2003
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement997 cc
90 HPPower70 HP
200 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size155/80 R13 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3985 mmLength3610 mm
1698 mmWidth1660 mm
1688 mmHeight1500 mm
1200 KgWeight810 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Musa and 2003 Toyota Vitz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…