DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Musa vs 2004 Toyota Passo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeToyota
MusaModelPasso
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
200 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3985 mmLength3595 mm
1698 mmWidth1665 mm
1688 mmHeight1535 mm
1200 KgWeight930 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Musa and 2004 Toyota Passo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…