DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lancia Musa vs 2012 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
LanciaMakeFord
MusaModelKA
2012Model year2012
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
15,4 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
159 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
180 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
DieselFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14

Dimensions

Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
4035 mmLength3620 mm
1698 mmWidth1894 mm
1660 mmHeight1506 mm
1200 KgWeight1055 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2300 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lancia Musa and 2012 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…