DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Lancia Musa vs 2009 Citroen C2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeCitroen
MusaModelC2
2009Model year2009
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
159 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1124 cc
70 HPPower60 HP
180 NmTorque94 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength3666 mm
1698 mmWidth1659 mm
1660 mmHeight1477 mm
1200 KgWeight956 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Lancia Musa and 2009 Citroen C2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…