2004 • Lancia
Musa
Lancia Musa 1.2 Multijet (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
2004 Lancia Musa vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.1 i 16V (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia MusaSpecificationRover 25
LanciaMakeRover
MusaModel25
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Lancia MusaSpecificationRover 25
15,4 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
159 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1119 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
180 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia MusaSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia MusaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5 DualogicGears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia MusaSpecificationRover 25
3985 mmLength3990 mm
1698 mmWidth1688 mm
1688 mmHeight1417 mm
1200 KgWeight1020 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Lancia Musa and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…