2004 • Lancia
Musa
Lancia Musa 1.2 Multijet (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
2004 Lancia Musa vs 2004 Ford KA Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
KA
Ford KA 1.3 i (70 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford KA
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
LanciaMakeFord
MusaModelKA
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
15,4 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
159 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
70 HPPower70 HP
180 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5 DualogicGears5
195/60 R15Tyre size165/60 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia MusaSpecificationFord KA
3985 mmLength3620 mm
1698 mmWidth1639 mm
1688 mmHeight1383 mm
1200 KgWeight890 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2448 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Lancia Musa and 2004 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…