DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lancia Lybra vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Lybra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeVolkswagen
LybraModelPolo
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
103 HPPower97 HP
144 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4466 mmLength4164 mm
1743 mmWidth1640 mm
1462 mmHeight1414 mm
1250 KgWeight1100 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2441 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lancia Lybra and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Lybra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…