DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lancia Kappa vs 2000 Nissan Elgrand Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Kappa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeNissan
KappaModelElgrand
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2959 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
204 HPPower170 HP
270 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/55R16Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4687 mmLength4740 mm
1826 mmWidth1775 mm
1462 mmHeight1940 mm
1520 KgWeight2060 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lancia Kappa and 2000 Nissan Elgrand approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Kappa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…