DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Lancia Kappa vs 1994 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Kappa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeCitroen
KappaModelXM
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
193 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
124 HPPower121 HP
250 NmTorque172 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4687 mmLength4710 mm
1822 mmWidth1795 mm
1462 mmHeight1385 mm
1450 KgWeight1310 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Lancia Kappa and 1994 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Kappa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…