DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lancia Kappa vs 1996 Buick Skylark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Skylark

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeBuick
KappaModelSkylark
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
218 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
175 HPPower152 HP
230 NmTorque196 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
205/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4687 mmLength4805 mm
1826 mmWidth1746 mm
1462 mmHeight1360 mm
1450 KgWeight1337 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2627 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lancia Kappa and 1996 Buick Skylark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Skylark leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…