DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Lancia Delta vs 1995 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeFiat
DeltaModelBravo
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1756 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
103 HPPower113 HP
142 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4025 mm
1703 mmWidth1755 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1102 KgWeight1100 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Lancia Delta and 1995 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…