DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Lancia Delta vs 1992 Fiat Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeFiat
DeltaModelTempra
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h17,4 s
0 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
90 HPPower65 HP
0 NmTorque119 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
10 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4354 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1445 mm
1005 KgWeight1130 Kg
—Wheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Lancia Delta and 1992 Fiat Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…